Understanding the Two-Child Benefit Cap
The two-child benefit cap was rolled out in April 2017 as part of a package of austerity measures orchestrated by then-Chancellor George Osborne. This policy restricts universal credit and tax credit support to the first two children in families, born after 6 April 2017. The aim? To align welfare benefits with the financial decisions that working families are typically expected to make. It was a move to reinforce the notion that families should live within their means, much like their employed counterparts.
However, for many low-income households, the consequence has been harsh. Families hit by the cap lose around £3,455 each year in benefits, a significant 14% dip in income that nudges them toward relative poverty. The stark reality is that over 1.6 million children are affected by this cap.
The Widespread Impact on Families
This policy has not only brought financial strain but has also affected family structures. Families with one parent and those with at least one working adult make up a significant portion—50% and 57% respectively—of those impacted. Notably, about 76% of impacted families are in the bottom 30% economically, showcasing which end of the income spectrum is mostly taking the hit.
There are some exemptions in place, mainly covering children born before the policy's onset and multiple births. Yet, these exemptions fall short of addressing the needs of numerous families grappling with everyday expenses.
The Labour Party, despite its criticism of child poverty as a societal burden, has hesitated to repeal the cap due to the daunting £3 billion financial implications. Internal disputes over this approach even led to the suspension of seven MPs who opposed the cap. In an effort to tackle child poverty, the government introduced the Children's Wellbeing Bill, boosting initiatives like providing free school meals and safeguarding children, though it left the two-child cap untouched.
Talks within the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) have recently shown interest in possibly relaxing some rules, like considering special allowances for families with young or disabled children or even raising the cap to account for a third child. Yet, strict government spending rules remain a barrier for any substantial policy shifts. Critics argue that the cap exacerbates poverty, with 93% of affected parents reporting reduced food affordability. Despite these challenges, the DWP insists it is examining all possible strategies to alleviate child poverty without capitulating to demands to scrap the cap entirely.
Write a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *